4 min readfrom UW News

UW School of Law to convene ‘Neither Sword Nor Purse,’ a national rule of law symposium on defending America’s independent judiciary

Our take

The University of Washington School of Law is set to host a pivotal national symposium titled “Neither Sword Nor Purse” on April 17 and 18, aimed at addressing the critical challenges facing America’s independent judiciary. In recent years, judges across the country have encountered unprecedented levels of political pressure, public scrutiny, and personal threats, raising urgent questions about the integrity of the judicial system and the rule of law. This symposium will bring together legal scholars, practitioners, and thought leaders to engage in meaningful discussions on how to safeguard the independence of the judiciary amidst escalating tensions. Participants will explore a range of topics, including the role of the judiciary in a democratic society, the implications of political interference, and strategies to ensure judicial safety and integrity. Through a combination of expert panels, interactive sessions, and collaborative workshops, attendees will seek to develop actionable insights and frameworks that can bolster the judiciary’s resilience against external pressures. The symposium reflects a commitment to fostering dialogue around the essential principles of justice and accountability that underpin the rule of law in the United States. As the judiciary stands at a crossroads, this gathering aims to galvanize support for an independent judicial system that operates free from undue influence. Join us at the UW School of Law to contribute to these critical conversations and help shape the future of America’s judiciary.
UW School of Law to convene ‘Neither Sword Nor Purse,’ a national rule of law symposium on defending America’s independent judiciary

The University of Washington School of Law is poised to host a significant national symposium titled “Neither Sword Nor Purse” on April 17 and 18, focusing on the pressing issue of defending America’s independent judiciary amid growing political pressures. As judges across the United States endure escalating public attacks and threats to their personal safety, this symposium serves as a critical platform for examining the measures necessary to protect the rule of law. In a climate where judicial independence is increasingly under siege, discussions like those planned at UW are essential for fostering a deeper understanding of the challenges facing our legal system.

The significance of this symposium cannot be overstated. It comes at a time when recent rulings, such as the one requiring Texas State University to reinstate a professor fired for discussing sensitive issues like Israel-Palestine relations, highlight the fraught intersection of law, politics, and academic freedom. This case is a stark reminder of how judicial decisions can influence not just the legal landscape but also the very fabric of educational institutions. Similarly, the ongoing legal battle involving Kentucky State University students and alumni against new state laws emphasizes the need for a robust defense of legal principles that safeguard educational environments. These examples underscore the importance of an independent judiciary that can operate free from external pressures, thereby ensuring that justice is administered fairly and equitably.

The UW symposium aims to address these critical issues by convening experts, scholars, and practitioners to explore strategies for fortifying the judicial system. By examining the role of the judiciary in maintaining the balance of power in a democratic society, attendees will engage in meaningful dialogue about the implications of politicizing judicial roles. This is particularly important as the public's perception of the judiciary shapes how laws are interpreted and enforced. An independent judiciary is not merely an ideal; it is a cornerstone of democracy that protects minority rights and upholds the rule of law against the fluctuating tides of political sentiment.

Moreover, the symposium's exploration of these themes aligns with broader societal concerns about the erosion of civil discourse and the politicization of judicial appointments. As evidenced by the recent discourse surrounding the independence of the judiciary, it is vital for citizens to be informed and engaged in discussions that affect their rights and freedoms. The potential outcomes of the symposium could set the tone for future advocacy efforts aimed at preserving judicial independence. Engaging in these conversations is not just for legal professionals but for all who value a fair and just society.

Looking ahead, it is crucial to consider how the insights generated from the UW symposium will resonate within our communities. As we witness ongoing debates about the role of the judiciary, the need for public awareness and advocacy in support of judicial independence becomes ever more urgent. Will the discussions at this symposium inspire a renewed commitment to protecting our legal institutions, or will we continue to see the judiciary become a battleground for political agendas? As citizens, we must remain vigilant and proactive in ensuring that the rule of law prevails, not just for ourselves but for future generations.

two images with a man with glasses on the left and a woman wearing a purple dress on the right
The UW School of Law is hosting “Neither Sword Nor Purse: Defending America’s Independent Judiciary and the Rule of Law,” a symposium featuring leading jurists, academics and journalists. Judge Robert Harlan Henry, left, scholar-in-residence, and Dean Tamara J. Lawson, right, are leading the symposium. Photo: University of Washington

As judges across the United States face growing political pressure, public attacks and threats to their personal safety, the University of Washington School of Law will host a national symposium on April 17 and 18 to examine how to protect America’s independent federal judiciary and the rule of law.

The two-day symposium, “Neither Sword Nor Purse,” at the School of Law, is sponsored by the American College of Trial Lawyers and planned in partnership with Keep Our Republic/Article 3 Coalition, the Society for the Rule of Law, and the Task Force for American Democracy. It convenes a slate of prominent judges, scholars and journalists who will examine the rule of law and the constitutional foundations of judicial independence.

“This symposium is designed to address a core constitutional concern,” said Toni Rembe Dean Tamara F. Lawson. “Attacks on an impartial and independent judiciary undermine public confidence in the courts, which weakens the foundation of the American legal system and its protections.” 

The U.S. judiciary system was designed to be independent precisely so it could uphold the rule of law, said Judge Robert Harlan Henry, the UW School of Law jurist-in-residence and a retired member of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

“At this moment, independence is under sustained challenges,” Henry said. “This symposium will confront those challenges directly.”

Hugh Spitzer, School of Law associate dean emeritus, said the participation in the symposium of respected judges, scholars and journalists reflect a rising concern that the U.S. system is in peril.

“The extraordinary group of judges and scholars share a commitment not just to diagnosing the problem, but to identifying meaningful ways to address it,” Spitzer said.

The symposium begins on Friday, April 17 and continues through Saturday, April 18.

Accessible Accordion

Jess Bravin, Wall Street Journal Supreme Court correspondent
Jeremy Fogel, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (ret.), Berkeley Judicial Institute
Thomas B. Griffith, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (ret.)
Paul W. Grimm, U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland (ret.), Duke Law School
J. Michael Luttig, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (ret.)
Kimberly J. Mueller, Judge, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California (ret.), Bolch Judicial Institute at Duke Law
Shira Scheindlin, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (ret.)
Debra L. Stephens, Chief Justice, Washington State Supreme Court
Seth P. Waxman, U.S. Solicitor General, 1997–2001
Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts (ret.)
Diane P. Wood, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (ret.)

Read on the original site

Open the publisher's page for the full experience

View original article

Tagged with

#Washington State University#public land-grant university#college-town atmosphere#rule of law#independent judiciary#symposium#American legal system#constitutional foundations#judicial independence#political pressure#public attacks#judges#personal safety#Toni Rembe Dean#Tamara F. Lawson#Robert Harlan Henry#American College of Trial Lawyers#Task Force for American Democracy#Keep Our Republic#Society for the Rule of Law