Free Speech Does Not End at Commencement

## Our Take: Free Speech at WSU’s Commencement

The University of Washington’s commencement ceremony, highlighted by the address from Nobel Prize winner and UW alumna Mary E. Brunkow, has sparked a conversation on a timeless issue: the sanctity of free speech. As the university community and alumni gather to celebrate graduates' achievements, the discourse extends beyond the stage, touching on the broader implications for academic freedom and political expression. This moment encapsulates the essence of higher education: a beacon for the exchange of ideas, irrespective of their political alignment.

At the heart of this discourse is the fundamental principle that university-sponsored events, including commencement speeches, are not official actions but rather platforms for expression. This principle is crucial because it protects the university from being investigated by the government for allowing free speech. It's a matter of academic independence and a commitment to fostering an environment where diverse opinions can flourish without fear of repercussion. As such, the university must uphold a standard of neutrality in its programming, ensuring that the promotion of free speech remains a cornerstone of its mission.

The debate over free speech at commencement ceremonies reflects a deeper conversation about the role of universities in society. Universities are institutions of learning that aim to cultivate critical thinkers and leaders who can navigate the complexities of the world. They must provide spaces where individuals can explore and challenge their beliefs, knowing that such an environment is essential for personal and intellectual growth. When political opinions are not viewed as discrimination and speech is not equated with action, it creates a fertile ground for dialogue and understanding. This is not to say that all opinions should be embraced uncritically, but rather that the university must foster an atmosphere where open discourse is encouraged and protected.

In the spirit of Upholding free speech, WSU, like any other university, has a responsibility to ensure that its commencement ceremonies reflect this commitment. This means not only welcoming speakers from a wide array of political, social, and cultural backgrounds but also actively working to counteract the fear of backlash that can deter individuals from sharing their perspectives. It means recognizing that the true measure of a university's impact on society lies not in silencing dissenting voices but in providing a platform for them to be heard.

Looking ahead, it is imperative for WSU and other universities to continue fostering an environment where free speech is not just an abstract concept but a lived experience. This involves being vigilant against attempts to limit the diversity of thought on campus and ensuring that commencement ceremonies serve as a testament to this commitment. As graduates leave the university with degrees and aspirations, they carry with them the values and principles that define the institution they have attended. By safeguarding free speech, WSU ensures that its graduates are prepared to enter a world that demands the courage to speak freely and the wisdom to listen actively.

In conclusion, the discourse on free speech at university commencement ceremonies is more than a current event; it is a reflection of the institution's values and its commitment to academic freedom. As WSU continues to navigate this conversation, it stands at the crossroads of tradition and progress, where the future of higher education will be shaped by the choices made today. The question that lingers is: How will the university of Washington, with its storied history of intellectual rigor and innovation, continue to champion the principles that have made it a beacon of free thought and open dialogue in the Pacific Northwest?